Using the Eisenhower Matrix to Identify Open Government Data Parameter Towards Information Disclosure in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 429
Download : 191
Main Article Content
Abstract
The openness of government data is considered essential and is an influential innovation in society to prevent corruption by increasing the transparency of information and data. One of the drivers for the emergence of Open Government Data (OGD) is the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era, which has influenced all aspects of life with all technological advances. Society needs open information to support and monitor the running of Government. However, it still needs to be determined whether the published OGD data is actual data or only data presented to cancel obligations to protect certain powers. From here, the author wants to conduct a study on OGD parameters using the Eisenhower matrix after reviewing several experts in the telecommunications sector as a basis for identifying parameters for the openness of information and government data in Indonesia. From the results of the analysis that we have carried out, it is found that government support is the highest parameter, followed by other parameters, namely policy, data transparency in the OGD portal, and the participation of citizens as the most crucial support in supporting the implementation of quality and quality OGD data publication in Indonesia. So, the final aim of this study is to provide a future view for all policies that will be made by the Government related to OGD to include all parameters that support data transparency that can be used optimally by the general public so that actual data publication is achieved that does not protect authority or specific power.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
A. Luthfi, M. Janssen, J. Crompvoets July). Stakeholder Tensions in Decision-Making for Opening Government Data, Springer, Cham (2020), pp. 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52306-0_23
Anastasija Nikiforova, Keegan McBride, Open government data portal usability: A user-centred usability analysis of 41 open government data portals, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101539
B. Ubaldi, Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 22 (2013).
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2017). A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.004
Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/mepsir/final_report.pdf.
Dekkers, G. et al (2006), -Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources‖, European
European Data Portal, 2020, Open Data Maturity, https://www.europeandataportal.eu/en/impact-studies/open-data-maturity, accessed: 10.09.2020
Felten, E.W. et al (2009), -Government Data and the Invisible Hand‖, Yale Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 11, p. 160, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1138083
Fhikri Fhutera Yudan, Muhammad Arief Virgy, Implementation of Open Government Data by Bandung City Government (2021)
Hendrawan, Arie. (2019). Open Government: Development and Future. Accessed at https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/1388938/18/open-governmentperkembangan-dan-masa-depan-1553196647 on 17 October 2019 at 15.04 WIB.
Ibrahim Mutambik, Anastasija Nikiforova, Abdullah Almuqrin, Yulong David Liu, Ahmad Floos, Taha Omar, 2021. Benefits of Open Government Data
Initiatives in Saudi Arabia and Barriers to Their Implementation
Indrajit, A. (2018). One Data Indonesia to Support the Implementation of Open Government Data in Indonesia. In B. van Loenen, G. Vancauwenberghe, & J. Crompvoets, Open Data Exposed (pp. 247-267). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-261-3_13
Janssen, K., 2011. The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Govern. Inform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.01.004
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., 2012. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inform. Syst. Manage. 29 (4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Kassen, M., 2019. Open data and e-government-related or competing ecosystems: a paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia. Inform. Technol. Develop. 25 (3), 552-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1412289
Hiramoto, Kenji, 2017, E-Government, Open Government and Open Data in Japan
K. McBride, M. Olesk, A. Kütt, D. Shysh Systemic change, open data ecosystem performance improvements, and empirical insights from Estonia: A country-level action research study, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190195
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology of citizen co-production in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
Maulia Jayantina Islami, One Data Indonesia Implementation: Challenges and Critical Success Factors (CSFs), June 2021
Mawanda, A. H. (2020). One Data Indonesia: Between There and Nothing. Suarakarya. Retrieved from https://www.suarakarya.id/detail/111198/Satu-Data-Indonesia-Antara-Ada-Dan-Tiada
McBride, K., 2020. Open Government Data Driven Co-Created Public Services (Doctoral dissertation). Available at: https://digikogu.taltech.ee/et/Item/e75082ae-9115-48c0-9526-09466e8a6698. Doctoral dissertation.
Nielsen, O. B., Persson, J. S., & Madsen, S. (2019). Why Governing Data Is Difficult: Findings from Danish Local Government. International Federation for Information Processing, 1, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04315-5_2
Nugroho, Y. (2017). After Data Synchronising and Sharing - What Do We Learn? Lesson from Satu Data. Jakarta: Kantor Staf Presiden RI
OECD, Indonesia Open Government Study, Key Issues, 2016
Open Knowledge Foundation, 2017, Global Open Data index, Methodology, https://index.okfn.org/methodology/, accessed: 10.09.2020.
Open Data Barometer, 2018, Report - From promise to progress, https://opendatabarometer.org/leadersedition/report/, accessed: 10.09.2020.
Pusat Edukasi Anti Korupsi, 2023, Aksi Informasi
Purwanto, Arie; Jansen, Marijne; Zuiderwijk-van-Eijk, A. (2017). Towards an Open Government Data Success Model A case study from Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Digital Government. Delft University of Technology. Retrieved from http://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/files/23067045/Full_Paper_Revised_Arie_Purwanto.pdf
S. Schnell Vision, Voice, and Technology: Is There a Global "Open Government" Trend? Admin. Soc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720918316
S. Martin, M. Foulonneau, S. Turkey 1-5 stars: Metadata on the openness level of open data sets in Europe, Springer, Cham (2013), pp. 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03437-9_24
Sieber, R. E., & Johnson, P. (2015). Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.003
Thomas, E. (2020). One Data Indonesia: Towards Government Big Data. Jakarta: FGD on Government Big Data Readiness
Toots, M., Mcbride, K., Kalvet, T., Krimmer, R., 2017. In: Open data as enabler of public service co-creation: exploring the drivers and barriers. IEEE, pp. 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.12
V. Wang and D. Shepherd, "Exploring the extent of openness of open government data - A critique of open government datasets in the UK," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 101405, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101405
Wang, H., & Lo, J. (2016). Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.004
Wilson, C., 2020. The socialisation of civic participation norms in government? Assessing the effect of the Open Government Partnership on countries' e-participation. Govern. Inform. Quarter., 101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101476