Performance Analysis Of DSDV, AOMDV and ZRP Routing Protocols Application Simulation In Pekanbaru Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET)

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 27, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17933/bpostel.2020.180204
Keywords:
AOMDV, DSDV, Vanet, ZRP
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 296
Download : 297
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Ery Safrianti
Universitas Riau
Linna Oktaviana Sari
Universitas Riau
Fitriani Saputri
Universitas Riau

Abstract

The increase in the number of vehicles without the development of driving safety technology, tends to create adverse impacts on society, such as a rise in casualties due to road accidents. Therefore, vehicles need information on the condition of the surrounding traffic environment to provide driver with safety. One of the methods used to obtain prompt information between vehicles that move dynamically is communication technology such as Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET). VANET has network characteristics that change rapidly due to the highly dynamic node movement. Therefore, it is necessary to choose the right routing protocol for optimal data transmission. In this study, the DSDV (Destination Sequenced Distance Vector), AOMDV (Ad-hoc on Demand Multipath Distance Vector), and ZRP (Zone Routing Protocol) routing protocols were tested using 3 field data scenarios. The first scenario is a variation of the number of nodes 100, 250, 600, and 700 nodes. The second scenario is a variation of the transmission ranges of 250m, 500m, and 1km. The third scenario is the variation of node speeds of 10 km/hour, 20 km/hour, 30 km/hour, 40 km/hour, and 50 km/hour in Pekanbaru city of Riau province. This research was carried out using the simulation method along with the QoS (Quality of Service) performance testing parameters comprising packet delivery ratio, end to end delay, throughput, collision rate, and packet loss. Out of the three scenarios tested, AOMDV is the best routing protocol to be implemented because it outperforms the other two protocol evaluated in all designated scenarios in the paper. Meanwhile, DSDV and ZRP are superior in end to end delay and routing overhead parameters, respectively.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 18 No. 2 (2020): December 2020
Section
Telecommunication

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

 

Author Biographies

Ery Safrianti, Universitas Riau

Jurusan Teknik Elektro

Linna Oktaviana Sari, Universitas Riau

Jursan Teknik Elektro

Fitriani Saputri, Universitas Riau

Jursan Teknik Elektro

References

Adiwicaksono, S., dkk., (2017). Deteksi Malicious Node Pada Zone Routing Protocol di Jaringan Mobile Ad Hoc Network. Tugas Akhir. ITS

Anggoro. R., (2017). Implementasi Routing Protocol DSR pada Skenario Mobility Random Waypoint dengan menggunakan Propagasi Nakagami. Jurnal Teknik ITS, Vol 6 No 2.

Anisia. R., dkk.,( 2016). Analisis Performansi Routing Protocol OLSR dan AOMDV Pada Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET). Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro, Vol 5 No 1.

Arditya, K. (2017). Implementasi Konsep Overlay Network Pada Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) Di VANETs. Tugas Akhir. Fakultas Teknik Informatika. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November Surabaya.

Dimyanti, M., Radityo Anggoro., Waskitho Wibisono., (2016). Pemilihan Node Rebroadcast Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Protokol Multicast AODV (MAODV) Pada VANETS. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi, Vol 14 No 2, pp. 198-206.

Iqbal, M.S., Sandy Febrian., dan Sjamjiar Rachman., (2018). Perbandingan Kinerja Protokol Routing DSDV, DSR, dan AODV Pada Jaringan Mobile Ad Hoc Dengan Menggunakan NS-2. Dieletrika, Vol 5 No 2, pp. 133-141.

Munadi, R., Debby Tri Wulandari., dan Ratna Mayasari., (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Dynamic Source Routing dan Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm Terhadap Tabrakan Data Pada Vanet. Jurnal UNDIP, Vol 20 No 04.

Nutrihadi, F., dkk., (2016). Studi Kinerja VANET Scenario Generators: SUMO dan VanetMobisim Untuk Implementasi Routing Protocol AODV Menggunakan Network Simulator 2 (NS-2). Jurnal Teknik ITS, Vol 5 No 1, pp.19-24.

Pradana, P.D., Ridha Muldiana Negara., dan Favian Dewanta., (2017). Evaluasi Performansi Protokol Routing DSR dan AODV Pada Simulasi Jaringan Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) Untuk Keselamatan Transportasi Dengan Studi Kasus Mobil Perkotaan. E-Proceeding of Engineering, Vol 4 No 2, pp. 1996-2004.

Virgono, A., Leana Vidya Yovita., dan Asty Valentina Hatauruk., (2016). Simulasi dan Analisis Perbandingan Performansi Protokol AODV & DSR Pada Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET). E-Proceeding of Engineering, Vol 4 No 2, pp. 793-801.