Perbandingan Biaya Jaringan dan Kelayakan Teknologi LTE pada Frekuensi 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz, & 2300 MHz untuk Mendukung Rencana Pita Lebar di Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan besarnya biaya penyelenggaraan teknologi LTE pada pita frekuensi 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz, dan 2300 MHz. Selain itu, dilakukan cost benefit analysis untuk melihat kelayakan bisnis teknologi LTE pada frekuensi tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan melakukan perhitungan link budget dan capacity dimensioning untuk memperoleh jumlah infrastruktur yang dibutuhkan, serta melakukan perhitungan biaya dan pendapatan untuk dilakukan cost benefit analysis (CBA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembiayaan operasional terbesar pada pembangunan jaringan LTE adalah BHP, kemudian disusul dengan harga sewa site. Biaya terbesar ada pada penggunaan pita frekuensi 2100 MHz dikarenakan BHP pita tersebut paling tinggi dibanding dengan frekuensi lainnya. Dari keempat frekuensi tersebut, frekuensi 2300 MHz paling layak digunakan, karena nilai BHP yang paling rendah dibanding frekuensi yang lain. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan, pembangunan jaringan LTE pada keempat frekuensi tersebut layak dilakukan, dengan internal rate of return (IRR) terbesar pada pita frekuensi 2300 MHz.
Abstract
This study aims to compare the cost of developing LTE technology at 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz, and 2300 MHz frequencies. In addition, cost-benefit analysis is carried out to find the feasibility of LTE technology business at those frequencies. This study uses a quantitative approach by conducting link budget and capacity dimensioning to obtain the number of cellular infrastructures. This study identifies and calculates cost and revenue for conducting cost-benefit analysis (CBA). The result shows that the most significant operational cost of LTE network development is BHP frequency (frequency license fee,) followed by site leasing cost. The most significant cost of LTE planning development from those frequencies is at 2100 MHz, because the frequency license fee of that frequency is the most expensive one among the other frequencies. The frequency of 2300 MHz is the most feasible frequency to use, since the frequency 2300 MHz license fee is the cheapest one among the other frequencies. According to the calculation result, LTE development at those frequencies is feasible, with the largest internal rate of return (IRR) is in the frequency of 2300 MHz.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Ariyanti, S., & Perdana, D. (2015). Analisis Kelayakan Implementasi Teknologi LTE 1.8 GHz Bagi Operator Seluler di Indonesia. Buletin Pos Dan Telekomunikasi, 1(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.17933/bpostel.2015.130105
ASEAN. (2013). Master plan on ASEAN Connectivity.
Chen, X. (2013). Analysis of the Impact of TD-LTE on Mobile Broadband.
Dirjen SDPPI. (2018). Keputusan Direktur jenderal Sumber Daya dan Perangkat Pos dan Informatika. Jakarta.
Jha, A. (2015). Techno-economic assessment of the potential for LTE based 4G mobile services in rural India. ANTS Conference, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2015.7413612
Jha, A., & Saha, D. (2017). Communication Systems and Networks, 10340, 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67235-9
Kishimoto, J. (2018). MIC Fifth Generation Mobile Communications System (5G) Field Trials Special Issue (Vol. 30).
Kominfo. (2014). Strategi Implementasi Rencana Pitalebar Indonesia ( RPI ) " Membumikan / down-to-earth " RPI Komitmen Global Broadband.
Lee, P. (2018). 5G Trials and Launch Plan in Korea.
Liu, Q., Shi, X., Wang, X., & Li, J. (2017). 5G Development in China: From Policy Strategy to User-Oriented Architecture. Mobile Information Systems, 2017, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2358618
Marcus, J. S., Burns, J., Jervis, V., Wahlen, R., Carter, K. R., Philbeck, I., & Vary, P. (2010). PPDR Spectrum Harmonisation in Germany , Europe and Globally. Bad Honnef.
Menkominfo. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2015.
Menkominfo. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 tahun 2017.
Miral, B. (2014). Jalan Panjang Pitalebar Indonesia.
Omnibus Broadband Initiative. (2010). A Broadband Network Cost Model: A Basis for Public Funding Essential to Bringing Nationwide Interoperable Communications to America’s First Responders.
Ovando, C., Pérez, J., & Moral, A. (2015). LTE techno-economic assessment: The case of rural areas in Spain. Telecommunications Policy (Vol. 39). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.11.004
Perpres. (2014). Peraturan Presiden RI Nomor 96 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Pitalebar Indonesia 2014–2019.
Puslitbang SDPPPI. (2018). Analisis Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia untuk Mendukung Efisiensi.
Wahyudin, A., Amalia, N., & Lindra, I. (2017). Cost benefit analysis of MVNO business models for LTE 4G services in Bandung city. Proceedings of 2017 4th International Conference on New Media Studies, CONMEDIA 2017, 2018–Janua, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONMEDIA.2017.8266039