Determinan literasi digital mahasiswa: kasus Universitas Sriwijaya [Determinants of students digital literacy: the case of Sriwijaya University]
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 806
Download : 834
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis kontribusi kesenjangan digital terhadap tingkat literasi digital di kalangan mahasiswa Universitas Sriwijaya. Peneliti menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh mahasiswa FISIP Universitas Sriwijaya yang berjumlah 3.414 orang. Sampel penelitian ditetapkan secara purposif sebanyak 200 orang dan dipilih dengan metode simple random sampling. Seratus responden dipilih dari kelompok digital native di Kampus Palembang dan 100 orang lagi dipilih dari Kampus Indralaya. Data dikumpulkan dengan wawancara terstruktur berpedoman pada kuesioner yang telah disiapkan. Data dianalisis dengan SPSS dan menggunakan tabulasi silang (chi-square dan uji Somers). Hasilnya, kesenjangan digital di kalangan mahasiswa Universitas Sriwijaya berbentuk perbedaan kepemilikan, biaya komunikasi, dan usia pertama kali mengoperasikan perangkat TIK (laptop, tablet, dan handphone). Hampir tidak ada perbedaan dalam tiga situs website yang paling sering dikunjungi, tiga tempat favorit mengakses internet, intensitas penggunaan, dan pola pemanfaatan perangkat TIK. Tingkat literasi digital mahasiswa FISIP Universitas Sriwijaya adalah ‘Tinggi’ dan ‘Sangat tinggi’. Ia tidak berhubungan dengan jenis kelamin, program studi, kepemilikan dan intensitas penggunaan TIK, keanggotaan dalam grup online, dan biaya komunikasi yang dikeluarkan. Secara statistik, literasi digital dipengaruhi usia pertama kali menggunakan perangkat TIK. Tetapi hubungan keduanya bersifat negatif dan tidak signifikan.
*****
This article aims to analyze the contribution of the digital divide to digital literacy among students in Sriwijaya University (SU), by using quantitative approach. Research population was 3,414 students at Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, SU. Research sample consists of 200 students chosen purposively by using simple random sampling method. A hundred students were selected from digital native in Palembang Campus, while the other 100 were from Indralaya Campus. Data were collected by a structured interview based on questionnaire and were analyzed using SPSS and cross tabulation (chi-square and Somers test). The results show that the digital divide among students in SU occurs in the forms of differences of ICT devices ownership, communication costs, and the age when the respondent used ICT devices (laptops, tablets, and mobile phones) for the first time. There is no difference between respondents in the aspects of three most frequently-visited websites, three favorite places in accessing the Internet, and the intensity and usage pattern of ICT devices. We also found that the digital literacy of SU students are in the level of 'high' and 'very high'. However, it does not relate to gender, discipline, ownership and usage intensity of ICT devices, membership in online groups, and communication costs. Statistically, digital literacy is influenced by the age when a respondent used an ICT device for the first time. In contrast, this relationship is negative and insignificant.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Ackermann, E. K. (2015). Give me a place to stand and I will move the world! Life-long learning in the digital age / Dadme un punto de apoyo y moveré el mundo: el aprendizaje permanente en la era digital. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 38(4), 689–717. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1076265
Alamsyah, A. (2015). Kontribusi pola literasi digital dosen terhadap pelaksanaan elearning di Universitas Sriwijaya. Indralaya: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Sriwijaya.
Anonymous, A. (2015). Sejarah Internet Indonesia - SpeedyWiki. Retrieved December 25, 2015, from http://opensource.telkomspeedy.com/wiki/index.php/Sejarah_Internet_Indonesia
Azmi, H. (2006). Teaching Information Literacy Skills: A case study of the QU-core program in Qatar University. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 1–20. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040145
Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2006). Gaps and bits: Conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. The Information Society, 22(5), 269–278. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600903953
Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. http://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007083
Bayrak, F., & Yurdugül, H. (2013). University Students’ Computer Literacy Readiness Level in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 3210–3215. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.370
Bediang, G., Stoll, B., Geissbuhler, A., Klohn, A. M., Stuckelberger, A., Nko’o, S., & Chastonay, P. (2013). Computer literacy and E-learning perception in Cameroon: the case of Yaounde Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 57–64. http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-57
Ensmenger, N. (2012). The Digital Construction of Technology. Society for the History of Technology, 53(4), 48–51. http://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2012.0126
Gamire, E., & Pearson, G. (2006). Tech tally: approaches to assessing technological literacy. (E. Gamire & G. Pearson, Eds.), Literacy. Washington D.C., USA: The National Academics Press.
Hawisher, G. E., Selfe, C. L., Guo, Y. H., & Liu, L. (2006). Globalization and agency: Designing and redesigning the literacies of cyberspace. College English, 68(6), 619–636. http://doi.org/10.2307/25472179
Ivanković, A., Špiranec, S., & Miljko, D. (2013). ICT Literacy among the Students of the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Mostar. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 684–688. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.261
James, J. (2008). Digital divide complacency: misconceptions and dangers. The Information Society, 24(1), 54–61. http://doi.org/10.1080/01972240701774790
Jara, I., Claro, M., Hinostroza, J. E., San Martín, E., Rodríguez, P., Cabello, T., … Labbé, C. (2015). Understanding factors related to Chilean students’ digital skills: A mixed methods analysis. Computers & Education, 88, 387–398. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.016
Jones, R. B. (2009). Visual Literacy. In Encyclopedia of the Social and Cultural Foundations of Education (pp. 851–853). ELEC, SAGE Publication Ltd. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963992
Kellner, D. (2001). New Technologies/New Literacies: Reconstructing Education for the New Millennium. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(1), 67–81. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011270402858
Kingsley, K., & Kingsley, K. (2009). A case study for teaching information literacy skills. BMC Medical Education, 9(1), 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-7
Kiss, G., & Gastelú, C. A. T. (2015). Comparison of the ICT Literacy Level of the Mexican and Hungarian Students in the Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 824–833. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.546
Min, S.-J. (2010). From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills, Political Interest, and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 22–35. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903109402
Nasah, A., DaCosta, B., Kinsell, C., & Seok, S. (2010). The digital literacy debate: an investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 153–170. http://doi.org/10.1007/sl
Norishah, T. P., Shariman, T., Razak, N. A., & Mohd. Nor, N. F. (2012). Digital Literacy Competence for Academic Needs: An Analysis of Malaysian Students in Three Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 1489–1496. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.090
Pappas, C. (2015). The Top eLearning Statistics and Facts For 2015 You Need To Know - eLearning Industry. Retrieved December 25, 2015, from http://elearningindustry.com/elearning-statistics-and-facts-for-2015
Prensky, M. (2012). Introduction: From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21th Century Education. California, USA: Corwin.
Qureshi, S. (2014). Overcoming Technological Determinism in Understanding the Digital Divide: Where Do We Go From Here? Information Technology for Development, 20(3), 215–217. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2014.930981
Roberts, P. (2000). Knowledge, Informationa and Literacy. International Review of Education, 46(5), 433–453. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004133615477
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
Santos, R., Azevedo, J., & Pedro, L. (2013). Digital Divide in Higher Education Students’ Digital Literacy. In S. Kurbanoğlu, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, R. Catts, & S. Špiranec (Eds.), Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice SE - 22 (Vol. 397, pp. 178–183). CHAP, Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03919-0_22
Sibii, R. (2009). Media Literacy. In Encyclopedia of Journalism (pp. 884–887). ELEC, SAGE Publication Ltd. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412972048
Stokes, W. (2008, December 25). Literacy. In N. J. Salkind & K. Rasmussen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 608–616). CHAP, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX2660600171&v=2.1&u=idpnri&it=r&p=GVRL&sw=w&asid=d98f1b290ec93e722610044b3c52e496
Viruru, R. (2003). Postcolonial Perspectives on Childhood and Literacy. In Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy (pp. 13–22). ELEC, SAGE Publication Ltd. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608207
Wang, Q., Myers, M. D., & Sundaram, D. (2013). Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 409–419. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y
Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry, 1, 41–49. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-007-0001-5
Wiley, T. G. (2008). Literacy and Biliteracy. In Encyclopedia of Bilingual Education (pp. 530–534). ELEC, SAGE Publication Ltd. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963985
Williams, P. J. (2009). Technological literacy: a multliteracies approach for democracy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 237–254. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9046-0